000			01113cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS40283
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u22803
041			_aeng
100			_aHarpum, C.
245			_aVacant possession - chamaeleon or chimaera? Parts I and II
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aConveyancer & Property Lawyer _vSeptember/October 1988,324-
520			_aWith reference to the ruling in Sheikh v O`Connor (1987 2EGLR 269), this two-part article examines the vendor`s obligation to give vacant possession both under open contract and under a special condition. Part I begins by outlining the case before attempting to show that the vendor`s obligations are actually more extensive than they appear from that case. Part II argues ...."that the obligation to give vacant possession is, "mutatis mutandis", directly analogous to the vendor`s obligation to show a good title free from encumbrances".... References to caselaw throughout.
650			_aVENDOR AND PURCHASER
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c15289 _d15289