000			01509cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS37146
008			090401t1986 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u2541
041			_aeng
245			_aHailbury Investments Ltd v Westminster City Council
260			_c1986
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1986) 1 WLR 1232(15)
520			_aHL 16 October 1986. Appeal by plaintiff company against previous decision allowing defendant rating authority`s appeal regarding the rating of the company`s unoccupied buildings described in the valuation list as "offices" but prevented from being so used by planning conditions . The rating authority contended that they were still the same hereditaments as those in the list and so the company was liable to pay rates on the premises as unoccupied properties under the General Rate Act 1967, Sched 1 Para 1 (1) . The company claimed exemption under Sched 1 Para 2. The company contended that the description of a hereditament shown in the valuation list was an essential element in the identity of that hereditament and so it followed that occupation of the physical entity described as offices in the list for any purpose other than as offices, was the occupation of a different hereditament. Therefore before any liability to pay rates in respect of that new and different hereditament could ar
650			_aGENERAL RATE ACT 1967 SCHED 1 PARA 2 A AND B
690			_aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c1529 _d1529