| 000 | 00894cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50720 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u22806 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aMillichap, D. | ||
| 245 | _aBelt uses and alternative sites fuel debate in court | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aPlanning (for the Natural and Built Environment) _v(1066) 29 April 1994, 24-25(2) |
||
| 520 | _aRaises the concept of a de facto `use class` derived from PPG2 against which it is possible to assess whether a development can be deemed `appropriate` or not. Discusses "Beech v SoS Environment" in these terms and examines the notion of `alternative sites` for contentious developments. | ||
| 650 | _aAPPROPRIATE USES | ||
| 650 | _aGREEN BELT | ||
| 650 | _aGYPSY SITES | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c15291 _d15291 |
||