| 000 | 00982cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS40319 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u23052 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aPowell-Smith, V. | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA ruling sure to be found at fault | |
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v347(5703) 2 February 1989, 7(1) |
||
| 520 | _aCritical review of the decision in Pacific Associates and Another v Baxter and Others , CA 1988, Abstract 40237, and the extent of the duty of care owed to the contractor by the supervising engineer under the FIDIC form of contract. | ||
| 650 | _aARENSON V ARENSON | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSION OF TIME | ||
| 650 | _aGLANZER V SHEPHERD | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aMICHAEL SALLISS AND CO LTD V CALIL | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c15447 _d15447 |
||