| 000 | 01080cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS51365 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u23473 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRuxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth; Laddingford Enclosures Ltd v Forsyth | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aAll England Law Reports _v1994 3 All ER 801-814(14) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 16 December 1993. Appeal against level of damages awarded over contractor`s failure to complete swimming pool to specified depth. HC ruled that the defect had not diminished value of pool. CA allowed defendant`s claim on the grounds that it was not unreasonable to award as damages the cost of replacing the pool in order to make good the breach of contract even though the shortfall in its depth had not decreased its value. | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aMEASURE OF DAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aSWIMMING POOL | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c15686 _d15686 |
||