000			01473cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS40388
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u23476
041			_aeng
245			_aRe Martin and Another`s Application
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 05 EG 85-89(3)
520			_aCA 10 May 1988. Appeal by Martin (M) from dismissal by LT of their application for the discharge or modification of a restrictive covenant , which related to part of their land. M applied for planning permission to build a detached house on part of his garden which was subject to a s37 agreement between M`s predecessor in title and the planning authority restricting use to that of a private open space . Following an appeal to the SoS Environment against a decision of the planning authority M was granted outline planning permission to build the house. Despite this, the authority declined to release M from the restriction and he applied to LT under the Law of Property Act 1925 s84 to discharge or modify the agreement. LT dismissed the application. At issue in CA was the effect of outline consent authorising development prohibited by the s37 agreement and whether the restrictive covenant should automatically be discharged. CA emphasised the two different statutory regimes: a local autho
650			_aPLANNING AGREEMENTS
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c15688 _d15688