| 000 | 01100cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS40400 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u23556 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 110 |
_aTouchstone _93077 |
||
| 245 | _aFraud by a co-owner | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v133(5) 3 February 1989, 143-144(2) |
||
| 520 | _aHighlighting relevant case law, the author discusses situations which may arise where a co-owner of land acts to the detriment of the other co-owner. The examples relate mainly to matrimonial home disputes. Despite the efforts of the courts to protect the innocent co-owner from being prejudiced by the actions of the forger, the innocent party is still exposed to the risk of the property being sold under the Law of Property Act 1925 s30 . | ||
| 650 | _aBENEFICIAL INTEREST | ||
| 650 | _aCEDAR HOLDINGS LTD V GREEN | ||
| 650 | _aFIRST NATIONAL SECURITIES V HEGERTY | ||
| 650 | _aREGISTERED LAND | ||
| 650 | _aTAYLOR V TAYLOR | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c15748 _d15748 |
||