000			01251cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS40408
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u23614
041			_aeng
100			_aWilkinson, H. W.
245		4	_aThe extent of the property conveyed: using the plan
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aNew Law Journal _v139(6395) 17 February 1989, 235-237(3)
520			_aDiscusses disputes which arise over the physical extent of property and the importance of the relative strength of the plan and its verbal description in solving such disputes. Illustrates with reference to Hatfield v Moss , CA 1988, Abstract 39862, where the lease of a flat was held to include the roof space ; Stroudley Investments Ltd v Barpress Ltd , where the lease of a building was held to include the roof and airspace above; Scott v Martin , CA 1987 Abstract 37806, where a grass verge was held to be included in a lease of a private road and Trailfinders Ltd v Razuki , ChD 1987 Abstract 39511, where it was held that landlords had no right to enter tenant`s premises to lay computer cabling .
650			_aCONVEYANCING
650			_aPLANS
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c15796 _d15796