000			01251cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS56504
008			090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u24131
041			_aeng
245			_aKened Ltd and another v Connie Investments Ltd
260			_c1997
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[1997] 04 EG 141-145(5)
520			_aCA 11 May 1995. Receivers appointed by second planitiff bank D assigned an underlease on a property to K; a wholly owned subsidiary of D, who provided a form of guarantee until acceptable assignment could be made. C later acquired the reversion of the lease. K subsequently made application for consent to assign the lease to R, but C refused, stating that they were not being offered a guarantee of a surety with sufficient assets. The court below held that C had unreasonably witheld consent. C`s appeal dismissed.
650			_aASSIGNMENT
650			_aGUARANTEES
650			_aKENED LTD AND ANOTHER V CONNIE INVESTMENTS LTD
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1988
650			_aLEASES
650			_aREPLACEMENT SURETY
650			_aSURETY
650			_aUNDERLEASE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c16163 _d16163