| 000 | 00957cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3014-49 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u24204 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBreak clause | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1994 EGCS 64 (9/4/94) |
||
| 520 | _a"A&J Mucklow (Birmingham) Ltd v Metro-Cammell Weymann Ltd", ChD 24 March 1994, concerned whether a lease with a break clause, which made it a condition for the exercise of the option that the tenant was to serve on the landlord a notice in writing to be given `not less than three months` before expiration of the third year of the term, was appropriately followed. | ||
| 650 | _aBREAK CLAUSE | ||
| 650 | _aEXPIRATION OF TENANCY | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aOPTION TO BREAK | ||
| 650 | _aVALIDITY | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c16219 _d16219 |
||