| 000 | 01307cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS40500 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u24336 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHenry Smith`s Charity Trustees v Wagle and Another | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 11 EG 75-80(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 23 November 1988 Appeal by the tenants (W) against a cc decision that their lease was not a protected tenancy within the Rent Act 1977 . The premises had been let as, and for some years used as, an artist`s studio , i.e. for professional or business purposes, but since 1977 had been used solely as a residence. W argued that a tenancy which ceased to be within Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II ceased to be excluded from the definition of `regulated tenancy` in the Rent Act; it was already within the `protected tenancy` unless so excluded. CA held rejecting appeal, that W`s submissions were supported by the statutory provisions and cases up to 1957, and possibly 1965, The meaning of the phrase "let as a separate dwelling" had since contracted and no longer included partial use for business. | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c16315 _d16315 |
||