| 000 | 01452cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X2466 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u24447 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aThames Water Utilities v East Hertfordshire DC | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1995) JPEL 706-719(14) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 1 November 1993. Challenge to local plan - allocation of green belt boundaries - two sites - agreement in principle betweeen Council and land- owner to include one site but exclude the other - proposal included in draft local plan- council reversed previously agreed policy - landowner not informed - inspector`s recommendation - modifications to draft plan - council`s failure to notify landowner of change of stance was unfair and prejudicial - the information given to inspector at inquiry was limited - legitimate expectation that council woudl defend the deposit draft - inadequate reasons for modification of deposit draft and failure to hold a further inquiry into the landowner`s objections was irrational and unfair - Application to quash plan allowed. (Journal abstract.) | ||
| 650 |
_aBoundary disputes _96221 |
||
| 650 | _aGREEN BELT | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (STRUCTURE AND LOCAL PLANS) REGULATIONS 1982 | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c16394 _d16394 |
||