| 000 | 01099cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS40518 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u24465 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aFranklin, K. | ||
| 245 | _aLegal report: breach of duty/liability | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aArchitects` Journal _v189(11) 15 March 1989, 71-73(3) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses two recent cases concerning breach of duty/ liability in the building industry. In the first case, South East Thames Regional Health Authority v Y J Lovell (London) and Others, a heating and services engineer was found by CA not to be in breach of duty of care following the collapse of a chimney-stack at Guy`s Hospital and in the second case, Richard Roberts Holdings Ltd v Douglas Smith Stimson Partnership & Others (1988) (Abstract 40096) a claim was made against architects regarding liability for defects in a effluent tank . | ||
| 650 | _aBUILDING DEFECTS | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 690 | _aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 700 | _aChappell, D. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c16405 _d16405 |
||