| 000 | 01100cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X2475 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u24511 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSouth Northamptonshire Council v SoS Environment; Morbaine Ltd v SoS Environment | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1995) 70 P&CR 224-243(20) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 2 March 1995. Alternative applications for large retail development - application to quash decision not to call in one application - s288 applications - whether alternative applications should be decided together - whether challenge to power of inspector properly made - whether second application prejudged at inquiry into first - whether applications potentially in conflict with emerging local plan premature. (Journal abstract.) | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS | ||
| 650 | _aRETAIL DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aSHOPPING AREA | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288 | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c16439 _d16439 |
||