| 000 | 01212cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS56601 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u24786 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aTaylor, T. | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe effect of disclaimer: a tale of two cases | |
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aThe Conveyancer _v(61) January/February 1997, 24-36(6) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses two cases "Hill v East and West India Dock Co." and "Stacey v Hill", which coexisted uneasily on the issue of the effect of a disclaimer of a lease by a trustee-in-bankruptcy or liquidator until the anomaly was ended by "Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Ltd". Outlines the statutory provisions concerning disclaimers and considers the position of sub-tenants following "Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Ltd". | ||
| 650 | _aDISCLAIMERS | ||
| 650 | _aHILL V EAST AND WEST INDIA DOCK COMPANY | ||
| 650 | _aHINDCASTLE LTD V BARBARA ATTENBOROUGH LTD | ||
| 650 | _aINSOLVENCY ACT 1986 S178 | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aSTACEY V HILL | ||
| 650 | _aSUBTENANTS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c16629 _d16629 |
||