| 000 | 01319cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS56609 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u24826 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHordern v Viscount Chelsea and another | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1997] 07 EG 144-149(6) |
||
| 520 | _aLVT 5 July 1996. H held an underlease of a first floor flat. Following a notice claiming a new lease, H applied to the tribunal for the determination of the premium payable. Her valuers suggested a sum of £233,340, the landlord sought a sum of £350,000 and contended a 10% deduction should be made from the value of the existing freehold to reflect the risk that H would claim security of tenure under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 PT I. "Held" premium payable was £283,100. A 25% deduction should be made to reflect the risk of a claim of security of tenure. | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSION OF LEASE | ||
| 650 | _aHORDERN V VISCOUNT CHELSEA AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PT I | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 | ||
| 650 | _aPREMIUM | ||
| 650 | _aSECURITY OF TENURE | ||
| 650 | _aUNDERLEASE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-LEASEHOLD REFORM | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c16654 _d16654 |
||