| 000 | 00878cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS56650 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u25053 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aThame, D. | ||
| 245 | _aOccupier: immobile phones | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v58(5) 7 February 1997, 26-27(2) |
||
| 520 | _aArgues that the boom in the mobile phone industry will not necessarily lead to increased property requirements because as competition intensifies, the phone companies` profits will decrease. Case studies on Orange, Vodafone and Cellnet. | ||
| 650 | _aCELLNET | ||
| 650 | _aMOBILE PHONES INDUSTRY | ||
| 650 | _aORANGE | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY INVESTMENT | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY REQUIREMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aVODAFONE | ||
| 690 | _aTRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c16803 _d16803 |
||