000			01434cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS40632
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u25138
041			_aeng
245			_aCoronation Street Industrial Properties Ltd v Ingall Industries plc
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aNew Law Journal _v139(6400) 24 March 1989, 401-402(2)
520			_aHL 16 March 1989 In August 1972 the tenant (T) was granted a lease of industrial premises and performance of T`s covenant s were guaranteed by the surety (I). The lease further provided that in the event of T going into liquidation and the lease being disclaimed I "hereby covenants with the lessor that it will accept ... a lease of the demised premises" for the unexpired residue of the lease and on the same terms and conditions except for the surety conditions. In 1984 T went into voluntary liquidation and the liquidators disclaimed the lease. The landlords (C) gave notice to I calling on it to take a lease of the unexpired term. I refused to enter into a new tenancy and C brought proceedings to enforce I`s covenant to accept a new tenancy. On appeal by I, HL held that the covenant by I is a covenant which runs with the land and is enforceable by C against I. Appeal accordingly dismissed.
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c16863 _d16863