| 000 | 01456cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS40677 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u25423 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSteward and another v Rapley | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 15 EG 198-208(6) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 19 February 1989. Appeal by the plaintiffs (S) from part of a decision awarding damages against the defendant (R), a surveyor , in respect of a claim for negligence in the structural survey and valuation of a property. In 1984 S instructed R to survey an older property in Mid Glamorgan whose asking price was £69,000. R put the market price at £60,000 and specifically stated that there was no dry-rot although he had discovered wet-rot . R concedes that the advice was negligent. The only question is the proper figure for compensation . The price paid for the property was £58,500. On discovery of the dry rot an independent surveyor agreed that the value of the property had fallen to £50,000. On further inspection he set the current value of the house at £33,200, the market value minus remedial costs, £26,800, exclusive of replacement carpets, professional fees, removal expenses, storage, accommodation and travelling expenses. The judge held that damages should be the difference betwe | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c17073 _d17073 |
||