000			01073cab a2200205 4500
001			WB2421-46
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u25574
041			_aeng
245			_aWife`s occupation defeats bank`s claim
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aTimes _v23/5/88 p34
520			_aIn Lloyds Bank Ltd v Rossett and Another , CA 13 May 1988, the purchaser appealed against a decision granting the Bank`s claim for possession . It was held that, under the Land Registration Act 1925 s20(1) and s70(1)(g), the relevant date for actual occupation in order for a overriding interest to subsist in registered land was when the legal charge was executed, not when it was registered. It was held further that where the wife had engaged almost daily in decorative work and builders carried out more extensive work, that was sufficient to constitute actual occupation.
650			_aBENEFICIAL INTEREST
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925 S70
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c17179 _d17179