| 000 | 01096cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2405-14 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u25581 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aOwners lose right to repay improvement grant | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v25/1/88 p31 |
||
| 520 | _aIn Regina v Hackney London Borough Council , Ex parte Gransils Investments Ltd QBD 21 Janury 1988, the court dismissed an application for judicial review against a notice of entry and a notice to treat served on Gransils Investments (G) by Hackney. G owned a property subject to a cpo. The council agreed not to enforce the order if G renovated the property with an improvement grant and made it available for letting; (the property was situated in a housing action area ). On completion G sought to repay the grant, thus avoiding the conditions imposed by the grant. | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING ACT 1985 S507 | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c17184 _d17184 |
||