| 000 | 00812cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2902-43 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u25626 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRent review | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1992 EGCS 161 (2) (9 January 1993) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses "Prudential Property Services Ltd v Capital Land Holdings Ltd", ChD 16 November 1992, which held that a letter in reply to a notice increasing the rent, stating that the tenant did not agree to the proposed figure did constitute a viable counternotice. | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE | ||
| 650 | _aCOUNTER NOTICE | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c17216 _d17216 |
||