| 000 | 01024cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS40734 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u25793 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aChappell, D. | ||
| 245 | _aDamages/Property survey | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aArchitects` Journal _v189(18) 3 May 1989, 69-70(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscussion of E Turner and Sons Ltd v Mathind Ltd (1986) (Unreported). Written terms incorporated into an oral contract do not give that contract the status of a written contract; a sum is not a penalty just because it is greater than the actual loss suffered; there is no reason why a single liquidated damages clause in a contract should be the limit of all losses in respect of late completion of phased handovers and if parties to a contract intended phased handovers to be contractual, they generally would be so and would give rise to damages . | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c17335 _d17335 |
||