000			01593cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS40808
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u26106
041			_aeng
245			_aBritish Rail Pension Trustee Co Ltd v Wilson
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aScots Law Times _v(1989) SLT 340-343(4)
520			_aOuter House 25 October 1988. The landlords (B) raised an action of declarator that their tenants (W) had forfeited their right to occupy agricultural land and must remove themselves therefrom. W occupied the land under two separate leases. They became in arrears of rent and failed to pay after a written demand. By provisions of the irritancy clause in both leases B could by written intimation end the leases, should W not pay the rent. Intimation was made in a single letter addressed to both tenants. Sometime later B wrote again intimating that they held the leases to be irritated on the grounds of failure to pay rent and required that W remove from the holdings. W contended that 1) the irritancy founded upon in the lease in each case could be purged and had been purged and 2) in any event, the letters were invalid since they were not separate letters in respect of each lease. Held that a conventional irritancy that was materially the same as a legal irritancy was capable of being pur
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
650			_aPOSSESSION
650			_aSCOTLAND
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c17520 _d17520