000			01483cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS40810
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u26116
041			_aeng
245			_aRhodes and Another v Allied Dunbar (Pension Services) Ltd and Another
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 19 EG 70-77(4)
520			_aCA 9 November 1988. Appeal by superior landlords (A) from decision holding that notices served by A requiring payment of rent by undertenants (U) to A were ineffective. The rent related to a freehold factory in Croydon. A claimed under the Law of Distress Amendment Act 1908 to be entitled to receive direct from U arrears due from the intermediate tenants (I). Simultaneously, receivers (R) appointed by a bank which had advanced money to I executed distress warrants to obtain payment of rent due from U to I. At issue was whether R was entitled to rents from U. If the notices served by A were effective R was not entitled to recover the rents from U, the distress was unlawful and the money should be handed over to A; if they were ineffective the distraints were lawful and R was entitled to retain the money. CA examined the provisions of the 1908 Act and decided that A were fully entitled to receive and give a discharge for U`s rent. R contended that s6 notices were not effective against
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c17527 _d17527