000			01556cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS40813
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u26131
041			_aeng
245			_aNicolaou and Another v Pitt and Another
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 21 EG 71-73(2)
520			_aCA 1 February 1989. Appeal by freehold owners (N) of flat, from cc decision in favour of respondents (P) and (A), holding that they had obtained a tenancy of the flat. At issue was whether an agreement for sharing occupation of the flat for a fixed term in consideration of regular payments created a licence or a tenancy. Originally P occupied the flat with two others under an agreement described as a licence. Later the other two left and A moved in. The parties entered into a new contract. This licence, expressly disclaimed the grant of exclusive possession and reserved to N the right to nominate further occupiers; it also declared that no landlord and tenant relationship was intended and that payments should not be regarded as rent . P later left the flat, leaving A to occupy it on his own, and in due course N purported to terminate the licences and sought possession of the premises. Cc judge rejected N`s claim, believing that N did not seriously contemplate introducing anyone else
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c17537 _d17537