000			01517cab a2200229 4500
001			X2804
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u26414
041			_aeng
245			_aC&G Homes Ltd v SoS for Health
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 06 EG 170-182(5)
520			_aCA 5 November 1990. An appeal against the HC decision that the use proposed by the SoS of two properties on an estate for four people in a half way house , would constitute breaches of restrictive covenant . In the six months prior to the appeal the SoS continued the use of the houses, during which time the number of staff on duty decreased. Any medical attention the residents received was available to anyone in their own home. There had been no friction with other estate residents. The SoS argued that as the covenant was entered into in 1989, after the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 had introduced the new class of C3 , dwelling house defined as a residence for not more than six residents living together as a single household , the houses were being used as a dwelling-house in the eyes of planning legislation. The covenant should therefore be construed to the like effect. This was upheld by CA.
650			_aBREACH OF COVENANT
650			_aCARE IN THE COMMUNITY
650			_aCOMMUNITY CARE
650			_aMENTALLY HANDICAPPED
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c17744 _d17744