| 000 | 00745cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2544-14 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u26703 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLandlords` occupation of premises | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEGCS _v(1989) 144 |
||
| 520 | _aMeyer v Riddick and others . CA 24 October 1989. The landlords, refusing to grant a new lease on a business tenancy , were not intending to occupy the premises as beneficeries under the trust but under a lease to a firm, where two of the respondent landlords worked, therby not satisfying Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s41(2) para (g) . | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c17970 _d17970 |
||