| 000 | 00959cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS52775 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u44 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBerkowitz v M W (St John`s Wood) Ltd and others | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1995) 14 EG 138-140(3) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 10 October 1994. The plaintiff vendor claimed that the estate agents had failed to inform him of the subsale of his flat at a substantially higher sum. This subsale was discovered to be bogus to defraud the mortgagee. Held, the estate agents` failure to detect the intention of a subsale by not properly acting on a fax was not a breach of duty. The vendor had not suffered any loss. | ||
| 650 | _aDUTY TO PURCHASER | ||
| 650 | _aESTATE AGENTS | ||
| 650 | _aFRAUD | ||
| 650 | _aSUBSALES | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c18 _d18 |
||