000			01116cab a2200241 4500
001			X2847
008			090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u26811
041			_aeng
245			_aHambros Bank Ltd v British Historic Buildings Trust and Din
260			_c1995
350			_a0
490			_aNew Property Cases _v[1995] NPC 179, (2)
520			_aCA 23 November 1995. A party seeking to establish a `non est factum` who can show that he is illiterate must also, if he is to succeed, show that he believed the document he was executing to be fundamentally different from what he believed it to be, and that he exercised proper care. A party who does not enquire as to the true nature of the contract he is executing will not be able to maintain `non est factum`. (taken from case heading). NOTE:- NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED.
650			_aContracts _96232
650			_aCOUNTY COURT RULES ORDER 15.1
650			_aHAMBROS BANK LTD V BRITISH HISTORIC BUILDINGS TRUST
650			_aILLITERACY
650			_aNON EST FACTUM
690			_aLAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c18054 _d18054