| 000 | 00859cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS40907 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u26886 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aPowell-Smith, V. | ||
| 245 | _aUsing the formula | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v349(5720) 1 June 1989, 7(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the decision in J Finnegan Ltd v Sheffield CC , QBD 20 September 1988, (1989) 43 BLR 124, in which the court adopted the Hudson Formula for calculating the contractor`s claim for overheads and profit during contract prolongation. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aEMDEN FORMULA | ||
| 650 | _aWHITTALL BUILDERS CO LTD V CHESTER LE STREET DC | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c18111 _d18111 |
||