000			00856cab a2200217 4500
001			X2860
008			090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u26906
041			_aeng
245			_aArthur and Arthur v Anker
260			_c1995
350			_a0
490			_aNew Property Cases _v(1995) NPC 187
520			_aCA 30 November 1995. A trespasser in a car park who was aware that a wheelclamping regime was in operation fails, on grounds of volenti, to recover damages against the security firm which wheelclamped his vehicle. He is not, however damage feasant. Wheelclampers do not commit theft or in this case, blackmail in England. (Headnote from journal). NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED.
650			_aCAR PARK
650			_aSECURITY FIRM
650			_aWHEELCLAMPING
690			_aLAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c18125 _d18125