| 000 | 01387cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50957 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u3015 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aShaw and another v Halifax (SW) Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 26 EG 142-146(5) |
||
| 520 | _aORB 11 February 1994. A preliminary issue in a claim by S against H for damages for a negligent valuation. The issue was whether S had suffered any loss and if so were entitled additionally to damages for inconvenience. Held, S were entitled to the difference between the market value of the property in August 1988 (£42,000) and its value at the time subject to defects (£37,000). Had S been advised of the defects, they would not have proceeded, or would have negotiated a reduction in price to reflect existence of defects; they paid too much because they were not told of the defects. S were also entitled to recover, subject to proof, items of expenditure incurred in consequence of H`s breach of duty, which did not form part of the repair costs; also damages for physical inconvenience and discomfort, subject to proof. | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aDEFECTS | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aSURVEYORS | ||
| 650 | _aVALUERS | ||
| 690 | _aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c1818 _d1818 |
||