000			01561cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS40984
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u27318
041			_aeng
245			_aGrounds v Attorney-General of the Duchy of Lancaster and Another
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 21 EG 73-81(5)
520			_aCA 20 April 1989. Appeal by landlords (D) from cc decision remitting an arbitrator`s (A) award and from cc judge`s direction as to the calculation of standard milk quota for a dairy farm occupied by the outgoing tenant (G). A dispute arose as to the amount of compensation payable to G at the end of the tenancy. The main point was whether additional milk production attributable to feeding concentrates should be excluded in calculating standard quota. A had decided that it was correct to include the effect of concentrates in accordance with normal farming practice. However, on D`s application to cc to set aside A`s award, cc judge decided to remit the award to A, with a direction that assessment of standard quota should exclude additional production generated by feeding concentrates. D appealed to CA. G contended that as a matter of law, exclusion in the Agriculture Act 1986 Sched 1 para 6(5) of "land used for growing cereal crops in the form of loose grain" meant that in calculating "
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c18383 _d18383