| 000 | 00845cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3239-39 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u27499 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRent reviews: real or notional? | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9641) 12 October 1996, 163(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIn "Dukeminster (Ebbgate House One) Ltd v Somerfield Property Co Ltd" a rent review clause that failed to specify where a notional premises may be located, is constructed in the landlord`s favour, but rectification is refused. | ||
| 650 | _aDUKEMINSTER EBBGATE HOUSE ONE LTD V SOMERFIELD PROPERTY CO LTD | ||
| 650 | _aNOTIONAL PREMISES | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aRETAIL WAREHOUSES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c18510 _d18510 |
||