| 000 | 00951cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS51448 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u27504 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aWard, C. | ||
| 245 | _aThird party precedents | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aPlanning Week _v2936) 8 September 1994, 14(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses four recent cases "R v Sheffield CC ex parte Power and others" (WB3022-31), "R v Canterbury CC ex parte Cox" (WB2939-33), "R v Swansea CC ex parte Elitestone Ltd" (Abs49692) and "R v Southwark LBC ex parte Daniel Davies & Co" (1993 EGCS 216) which examined whether third parties have a right to challenge planning decisions which adversely affect their interests. | ||
| 650 | _aJUDICIAL REVIEW | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING APPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING DECISIONS | ||
| 650 | _aTHIRD PARTIES | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c18515 _d18515 |
||