| 000 | 01196cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X2977 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u27637 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLoup and others v SoS Environment and Salisbury DC | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1995 JPL 22-32(11) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 19 May 1995. Residential development - proposed by-pass - permission refused - refusal upheld on appeal - decision quashed in High Court - redetermination of appeal - advent of s54A - effect of -second determination upheld refusal - quashed in High Court - appeal to CA - adequacy of SoS reasons - whilst convoluted nonetheless clear - weight to be given to development plan under s54A - allegation of double counting not sustained - matter for decision taker - appeal allowed decision of SoS restored. (Taken from header note) | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS | ||
| 650 | _aRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aSTRUCTURE PLANS | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S54A | ||
| 650 | _aWILTSHIRE | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c18609 _d18609 |
||