000			01201cab a2200241 4500
001			WB2742-37
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u27677
041			_aeng
245			_aPossession action
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1991 EGCS 98 (26 October 1991)
520			_a"Land v Sykes and another" CA 11 October 1991, an appeal by defendant tenant`s executors over validity of Case E and Case G notices to quit. Landlord argued that following S`s death, the Case G notice had ended the executors right to possession. On the other hand, the executors who had continued paying rent, argued that a Case E notice was valid and that the tenancy had been terminated and that they enjoyed a right to possession with the protection of the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. Appeal dismissed.
650			_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
650			_aCASE E NOTICES
650			_aLAND V SYKES AND ANOTHER
650			_aNOTICES TO QUIT
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c18638 _d18638