| 000 | 01436cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS41042 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u27781 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aCole v Swansea City Council | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 20 EG 123-128(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 2 December 1988. Appeal by housing authority (S) from cc decision, quashing a demolition order made by S in respect of a terraced house owned and occupied by (C). C was elderly and wished to remain in the property. Satisfying themselves that the house was unfit for human habitation and was not capable of being rendered fit at reasonable expense, S served notice on C under the Housing Act 1985 s264 . As no offer to undertake the works, S served a demolition order under s265. C appealed, contending that the house was capable of being rendered fit at reasonable expense. It was agreed that, in its present condition, the house was worth £15,000; repair s estimated at £31,355 by S and £23,017 by C. If the works set out in the Scott Schedule were carried out, S`s valuer estimated that the house would be worth £29,000; C`s valuers estimated its worth at £32,000. The cost of repair exceeding the increase in value significantly. Cc however took into account :1) that C was anxious to keep th | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c18715 _d18715 |
||