| 000 | 01433cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS41051 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u27866 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aAssessor for Lothian Region v Harper | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aScots Law Times _v(1989) SLT 321-331(11) |
||
| 520 | _aLVAC 6 July 1988. Appeal by Assessor (A) from decision allowing ratepayer`s (H) appeal from A`s refusal to allow industrial derating of premises occupied by H. H operated a photocopying and printing business, which included a retail counter. H submitted that the workshop and production areas could be regarded separately from the retail area and were entitled to industrial derating. A contended that the premises constituted a unified retail business of which the printing works was an integral part, or, alternatively, that the primary use was as a retail shop. The VAC allowed H`s appeal; A appealed to LVAC. Held :1) in determining whether the premises were primarily occupied and used as a shop, occupation and use of the whole premises had to be considered; 2) the committee had erred in only looking at the workshop areas; 3) whether or not the business was a unified one was a conclusion to be reached on the facts and not as a formula to be applied; 4) having regard to the limited value | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c18781 _d18781 |
||