| 000 | 01406cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS41057 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u27910 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTax relief forfeited | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTaxation _v123(3204) 15 June 1989, 326-327(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses R v Inspector of Taxes ex parte Brumfield and others, (WB2447-47) which involved a farming partnership between Mr & Mrs B and their son. The son arranged to purchase the farm with a cousin at a cost of £249,558, financed partly by an interest free loan of £210,559, with no stated date of repayment, from the partnership. This sum had been borrowed from a bank. The sons land was farmed by the partnership, on a rent free basis the loan interest being regarded as in lieu of rent. Interest in the partnership accounts totalled £25,480, as reflected in the balance sheet as part of the bank borrowing. A separate amount of £120,559 was shown as a loan due from the son. The accountants claimed these transactions fell within Statement of Practice SP4/85 but wrote to the Inland Revenue for confirmation. The claim was rejected; the interest on the loan ought not to be treated as a trading expense as the loan was not used to purchase an asset but to lend to the son. Also it was usual for | ||
| 690 | _aTAXATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c18813 _d18813 |
||