| 000 | 01196cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2710-22 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u28100 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRent review and the hypothetical tenant | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEGCS _v1991 21 (2/3/91) |
||
| 520 | _aOrchid Lodge UK Ltd v Extel Computing Ltd CA 21 February 1991, Concerns the rent review of a business tenancy for which planning permission had been granted for a use with Class II of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1972 . License provided that rent review would be on basis of authorised use with the tenant acknowledging that premises were fit for use and occupation by disregarding any improvements. CA upheld CC decision that condition of premises at date of grant of the hypothetical lease must be in a state to enable hypothetical lessee to carry on business described in 1985 planning permission. Applied Law Land Co v Consumers Association . | ||
| 650 | _aDISREGARDS | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S34 | ||
| 650 | _aUSER COVENANTS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c18951 _d18951 |
||