000			01297cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS41147
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u28438
041			_aeng
245			_aChesterfield and Co Ltd v Zahid and another
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 29 EG 75-78(3)
520			_aQBD 26 January 1989. In this action estate agents (C), claimed against the defendants (Z) and (A), commission from the sale of a house. There were questions as to whether liability for commission was attached to Z and A or to a company in which they were interested; whether one or two princesses of the Saudi royal house were involved in the negotiations; who exactly were appointed to find a purchaser; who secured an introduction and who was the effective cause of sale. QBD held that the instructions were given by Z and A, not by the company and that only one princess was involved in the transaction. C were the effective cause of sale, the effective introduction being made by C`s subagents.
650			_aCHESTERFIELD AND CO LTD V ZAHID AND ANOTHER
650			_aESTATE AGENTS' COMMISSION
650			_aEFFECTIVE CAUSE
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c19148 _d19148