000			01173cab a2200241 4500
001			X3107
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u28481
041			_aeng
245			_aSouth Northamptonshire CC v SoS Environment; Morbaine Ltd v SoS Environment
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1996 JPL 135-151(17)
520			_aCA 2 March 1995. Alternative applicaitions for retail food stores. One application called in. Other appealed against non-determination. Refusalal to call-in the second application. No need to give reasons for refusal to call-in. Refusal to call-in upheld in CA, Meaning of `satisfactorilyly accommodated` as regards the proposed retail store. Alleged inconsistency of approach by the Inspector. Decision of Inspector restored.. A(Headnote from abstract)
650			_aLOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS
650			_aRETAIL DEVELOPMENT
650			_aSHOPPING AREA
650			_aSOUTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE CC V SOS ENVIRONMENT
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c19169 _d19169