| 000 | 01122cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | A384 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u28874 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aClaringbull, J. | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe contractor`s basis of valuation for rating and the new non-domestic rate | |
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Valuation _v7(4) 1989, 315-324(8) |
||
| 520 | _aInitially examines the evolution of the contractor`s basis of valuation for rating, the valuation framework currently adopted and the definitions that have emerged from litigation; it considers the need for a review of the elements of the valuation framework in the light of recent economic changes and a more accurate approach to quantification. A possible solution proposed by Government is discussed both within the context of England and Wales and also in the light of the contractor`s principle in Scotland | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTORS BASIS | ||
| 650 | _aDEPRECIATED REPLACEMENT COST | ||
| 650 | _aRATING VALUATION | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c19425 _d19425 |
||