| 000 | 01268cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3127-23 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u28955 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aAgricultural holdings arbitration | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1995) EGCS 116(1) (8/7/95) |
||
| 520 | _a"J W Childers Trustees v Anker" CA 29 June 1995. Concerned the treatment of two parcels of land let under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1948 as amended. The tenancies started at different dates but the agreement at rent review expressed one rent for both holdings. CA allowed the tenant`s claim that there was one holding but held that marriage value was a relevant factor for the arbitrator`s consideration. | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1948 | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aMARRIAGE VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aNATURE CONSERVANCY COUNCIL | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c19482 _d19482 |
||