| 000 | 01102cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3127-30 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u29011 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTelecommunications | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1995) EGCS 121(1) (8/7/95)) |
||
| 520 | _a"Tandridge DC v Telecom Securicor Cellular Radio Ltd" QBD 27 June 1995. Their first telecommunications planning application with requisite fee having been refused, the defendants submitted drawings of a new site but without a fee and written description and without calling it an application. On the expiry of the 28-day notice period, they maintained they had deemed approval. The plaintiffs claim, that the second application was not valid was upheld. | ||
| 650 | _aGENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER (AMENDMENT) (NO6) 1992 CONDITION A2 | ||
| 650 | _aOBJECTIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING APPLICATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aTELECOMMUNICATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aTELEPHONE | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c19525 _d19525 |
||