| 000 | 01079cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS41266 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u29259 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aStylo Properties Ltd v Legal & General Assurance Society Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 31 EG 56-58(2) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 3 March 1989. This case rests on the meaning of "proportion" and the judge in accepting, in this context, the definition "the relation existing between things or magnitudes as to size, quantity, number etc; comparative relation, ratio" made a declaration in the landlord`s (L) favour. The original rent was 109.13% of the initial rent agreed by both parties based on open market assessment and the reviewed rent was to be that proportion, 109.13%, of the fair rack-rental market value of the premises. The plaintiffs claimed that the rents should remain the same as a proportion cannot be greater than 1. | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c19703 _d19703 |
||