| 000 | 00773cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2834-23 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u463 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _a`Subject to contract` ambiguous | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aChartered Surveyor Weekly _v40(10) 3 September 1992, 64(1) |
||
| 520 | _aPreliminary attention in "Fraser Williams (Southern) Ltd v Prudential Holborn Ltd" HC 22 July 1992, was taken up with a decision as to whether the phrase `subject to contract` in correspondence required a formal contract or that a letter, arguably a letter of intent, could be taken as binding. | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aSUBJECT TO CONTRACT | ||
| 690 | _aLAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c198 _d198 |
||