| 000 | 00839cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2614-37 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u29423 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aIntention of joint benefit | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aFinancial Times _v4/4/90 p20 |
||
| 520 | _aLloyds Bank plc v Rosset and another HL 29 March 1990. The House of Lords allowed an appeal by the bank claiming possession of property held in the name of the defendant`s husband as the wife, although able to prove occupation at the time of transfer giving her an interest under Land Registration Act 1925 s70(1)(g) , was unable to prove intention between the husband and herself that he held the house for their joint benefit. | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c19819 _d19819 |
||